zet

Micro-Virtualization vs eBPF?

After a great conversation yesterday regarding the easiest way to manage IT infrastructure it seems clear that the future of containerization will remain strong, but diminish in areas where a microVM makes more sense. Any time containers are being used as “systems” instead of applications (as designed) is where the microVM revolution will really have an affect. Things like Kubevirt will completely die the death it deserves.

Related:

• microVM: Another Level of Abstraction for Serverless Computing | by Mostafa Moradian | ITNEXT
  https://itnext.io/microvm-another-level-of-abstraction-for-serverless-computing-5f106b030f15?gi=637a2d6e8fd3
• https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/
• What is CRICTL and Why Should You Care?
  http://crunchtools.com/what-is-crictl-and-why-should-you-care/
• Introducing CRI-O 1.0
  https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/introducing-cri-o-10
• GitHub - opencontainers/runtime-spec: OCI Runtime Specification
  https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec (runtime.md, lifecycle)
• The differences between Docker, containerd, CRI-O and runc - Tutorial Works
  https://www.tutorialworks.com/difference-docker-containerd-runc-crio-oci/
• Solved: podman vs CRI-O vs RunC - Red Hat Learning Community
  https://learn.redhat.com/t5/Containers-DevOps-OpenShift/podman-vs-CRI-O-vs-RunC/td-p/9639

This site is open source. Improve this page.